Home | Appraisal Services | Construction & Design Services | Profile & Qualifications | Market News | Contact Us

December 8, 2011

Partial Interest Valuation - A Case Study

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — marc @ 6:15 am

Partial Interest Valuation of Real Estate

~ A Case Study by Marc P. Nadeau, SRA

Partial Interest Value ~ The Concept

Partial interest valuation is a technique used by appraisers and other valuation professionals to estimate the value of a fractional interest in real estate. Fractional interests in real estate result from the owner’s ownership of less than 100% of a given property. The technique involves the valuing of a fractional interest in real property with a discount factor being applied to that fractional interest. Reflective of what could be a number of factors including, but not limited to the nature of the property, the percentage or ownership and the management structure in place an appropriate “discount factor” is chosen by a valuation professional. Ownership of a partial interest in real property ownership can manifest itself in a number of forms. Those ownership forms include, but are not limited to: general partnerships, limited partnerships, REITs, joint tenancy, tenants in common, tenancy by entirety, family trusts and ownership of shares in a limited liability corporation.

The transfer or conveyance of a partial interest can arise from any number of events including: divorce, partnership dissolution, estate planning, donation or sale of a partial interest to an unrelated party and so on. In theory, partial interests are almost always worth less than their fractional value. For example, a $1 million dollar property owned by five different owners, each with a 20% interest, would in pure mathematical terms have a value of $200,000 for each interest. That 20% interest, were it to be marketed or sold to another party would be considered a minority interest.

The nature of a minority interest is that it typically has the following characteristics:

  • Lack of Marketability
  • Longer than typical Marketing time
  • Lack of Control
  • Limited or no ability to refinance the property
  • Limited ability to influence decision-making policies

Discounts associated with a partial interest can typically range from 20% to 60% of the proportionate value of the interest as it relates to the entire property. In the case of the $200,000 fractional interest above, a discount factor would be applied to the fractional value.

The IRS perspective

The perspective or position of the IRS has frequently been that the discount applied to the fractional interest be limited to the actual cost of partitioning a property. The courts fortunately, have generally recognized that this is both unreasonable and illogical. The fact is that fractional interests for the most part have a very limited market appeal to the general marketplace with the range of appeal varying by the type of property and the percentage of ownership.

The IRS Training Manual for Appeals Officers in fact recognizes and cites several factors that could influence the size of the discount. The following factors are listed in the manual:

  • The number of owners
  • The size of the fractional interest
  • The size of the tract
  • The use of the land
  • The availability of financing and finally,
  • The cost of partitioning (dividing) the land

Valuation Methodology

The following steps would be involved in valuing a partial interest:

1. Value the property in its entirety;

2. Calculate the value of the proportionate share in the property by taking the 100% value of the property times the percentage of property owned;

3. Determine an appropriate discount for the partial interest;

4. Calculate the value of the fractional interest by multiplying the value of the “proportionate share” times the discount rate.

Discount Rates ~ what are appropriate rates?

Reflective of the fact that partial interests have very limited marketability there is certainly a lack of empirical market data that appraiser’s can draw from. One of the best benchmarks for determining an appropriate discount would be court cases.

The following is a summary of relevant court cases that involve partial interest valuations:

In the case of Lefrak vs. Commissioner the court did not consider fractional discounts as compelling evidence because security owners do not have the right to force partition (the shares were part of a corporate entity). However, the Court did allow a 30% discount for a minority interest and a lack of marketability.

In the case of the Estate of Cervin vs. Commissioner the Court allowed a 20% discount for a 50% undivided interest in a homestead and farm. The legal costs along with the time delays and discounts required by a prospective buyer were reasons for the granted discount.

The case of Williams vs. Commissioner involved the transfer of a 50% interest in 2,360 acres of rural land and its timber in Putnam County, Florida. The court found a discount of 44% to be reasonable. The discount factored in the cost of partitioning, the longer than typical anticipated marketing time and the lack of

control.

The case of the Estate of Baird vs. Commissioner involved minority interests of timberland located in Louisiana. The plaintiffs specifically in this case were that of the Estate of John L. Baird and the Estate of Sarah W. Baird who were married at all pertinent times. John died on December 18, 1994 while Sarah died less than 1 year later on November 2, 1995. At times of death, John held a 14/65 interest while Sarah held a 17/65 interest in a trust that owned 16 noncontiguous tracts of timberland comprising 2,957 acres.

Both estates claimed a 60% discount on the tax returns with the plaintiffs mounting an impressive case that involved the testimony of two real estate appraisers that had extensive experience in valuing timberland as well as a third expert witness that had the experience of actually purchasing partial interests of like timberland. The appraisers, by product of analyzing actual partial interest sales of timberland arrived at discounts of 55% and 36% respectively while the timberland expert claimed that the discount should be 90%, while the written report prepared by the same expert claimed “at least a 55% discount”. The Court found that a 60% discount was reasonable and supported.

Empirical Market Data ~ Partial Interest Sale

Locating actual sales of a partial interest is like finding a needle in a haystack. Given the lack of marketability combined with the difficulty of verifying such a transaction can leave appraisers very little to work with. Presented below is a recent example of a partial interest sale that the readers of this article may find useful in their own analysis of a partial interest:

Case Study ~ Sale of Partial Interest

This study involves the sale of a 1/5 interest in a property identified as Uncas Point Road located in Guilford, Connecticut. The parcel is a vacant, non-buildable waterfront parcel that contains .67 acres and was owned by 5 separate owners, each with an undivided 1/5 interest in the land. The value of the parcel is that is provides access to and has frontage along the harbor.

Established factual information of Case Study

Grantor: Jonathan Wallace

Grantee: Carolyn Matthes

Sale Date: July 1, 2010

Sale Price: $ 3,750 plus $1,000 in assumed property taxes

Volume/Page: 801/340, Warranty Deed

Interest Purchased: 1/5 fee simple interest

Additional Facts for this Case

An independent appraiser appraised the property on September 24th, 2007 for $75,000. With documented time adjustments the value of the property as of July 1, 2010 (the conveyance date) would have been $52,500. $52,500 divided by 5 = $10,500. $10,500 would be the value of a 1/5 interest before factoring in any discount. The discount factor derived from this sale would be 55%.

This appraiser interviewed both parties, both of who indicated that they were each acting in their own best interest. Ms. Matthes is a neighboring property owner who lives across the street from the parcel and is attempting to purchase the entire parcel in pieces in order to have a full, undivided fee simple interest in the parcel.

Bio of the author

Marc Nadeau is a designated appraiser which extensive experience in appraising and consulting on properties with tax implications. Additional information regarding Mr. Nadeau’s services is available at: www.marcnadeau.com

August 9, 2010

State of the Market - Part II

Filed under: the home market — marc @ 2:30 am

In the previous posting on my site I discussed market trends and why, at the time I felt that we would continue to experience market decline through 2010. 

Realtors, homeowners, builders and developers alike are no longer in a state of denial when it comes acknowledging that we have experienced serious market decline. 

Current Market Trends ~ Inventory appears to have leveled off for most market sectors, especially in the lower price points (regardless of what market we are talking about).  The spring months experienced a surge in activity by way of greater sales and more prospective buyers bidding on properties.  As we are now in August and the market has returned to its anemic pace of last year it is clear that the “surge” in activity that we experienced was attributed to the Federal Tax Credits that were being offered to prospective home buyers.   Yes, it certainly looked good for a couple short months but now we are back in the doldrums of a stale real estate market. 

Market Complications ~ Complicating the anemic market further is the fact that credit and mortgages are hard to come by.   More stringent reporting requirements that have been placed on banks by Fannie Mae combined with a revised credit score reporting system (as it relates to mortgage applications) have only exasperated the home market. 

What will it Take? ~ An ease of credit and mortgage requirements along with a real increase in real income are necessary to refuel this stale market.   The last time we experienced such a down market was in 1991/1992.  It took nearly 7 years for the market to recover and that is likely true for this market as well.

The market continues its correction reflective of the fact that home prices just got to be too expensive relative to what people can actually afford.  According to the Connecticut Economic Resource Commission, in 2008 the average annual household income for the Town of Guilford was $97,577.   Comparing this figure to the State average of $67,236 the Guilford figure stacks up quite favorably.  The Guilford figure of $97,577 compared to the median house price of $425,000 looks less favorable and, when compared to the average new construction price of $750,000 at that time, the affordability becomes even less feasible. 

What’s Ahead? ~ A continued downward trend in prices and values are expected, especially in areas where abundant inventory exists.  This appraiser is convinced that the market will continue its 6% decline for the general market through the end of the year and likely well into 2011.

 

 

 

January 13, 2010

Historic Homes ~ An Evolving Market Perspective

By: Marc P. Nadeau, SRA

Being from New England, when one thinks of a historic home the image often conjured up is that of a 1700s center chimney cape, a Federal style from the early 1800s, a Second Empire Victorian or even a brownstone.  All have become part of the architectural landscape that helps define New England.   The bulk of the architectural styles that everyone from appraiser to homeowner to builder has come to know were for the most part born during a 200-hundred-year period.  That period extends roughly from the year 1700 to 1900.

Fast forward to 1950, enter the modernists.  The A-list of architects that settled in New England and graced us with some of the most innovative and imaginative house designs include the likes of Philip Johnson, Marcel Breuer, John M. Johansen, Walter Gropius and Paul Rudolph.   For those not akin to architectural history and it’s drivers (so to speak), Mr. Johnson was perhaps the most celebrated American architect of the last half-century while Mr. Gropius and Mr. Rudolph served as deans of the Harvard and Yale Architecture Schools respectively.

The modernist style, embraced by some and distained by others has without question earned its place in the American catalog of historic homes.  Perhaps most famous of the Modernist movement is the “Glass House” located in New Canaan, CT.   The property is now owned and run by the National Trust for Historic Preservation with tours being available.

Philip Johnson's Glass House, New Canaan
Philip Johnson’s Glass House, New Canaan, CT

Value of Historic Homes

Historic homes of all periods continue to hold their own against their more modern contemporaries, often being sold at premiums over and above the general marketplace.   Homes designed by notable architects also seem to have their own unique value points and typically result in an even greater premium of value.   This appraiser, in the not too distant past had the assignment of appraising a Philip Johnson home in New Canaan, CT.  The historical array of comparable sales included homes by Johanson, Marcel Breuer and even a Frank Lloyd Wright design.  The collective array of sales from these well known architects demonstrated a distinctly higher value point over and above their lesser-known contemporary architects.

Endangered Species

Despite the market’s willingness to pay a premium for historic and antique homes these properties continue to be threatened with demolition from all walks of the development world.  Be it the homeowner looking to expand upon an existing structure, a developer seeking to maximize profit or the architect/designer wanting to make more productive use of existing spaces, these properties often become dated, outmoded or just cease to function for the modern-day dweller.

In recent years, there have been a number of publicized properties that faced demolition including the Meeker House, a 150-year-old house on Cross Highway in Westport, a 1950’s Paul Rudolph house on Minuteman Hill Road in Westport and the Alice Ball House, a Philip Johnson design in New Canaan.  The Meeker House was disassembled and moved to a different location, the Rudolph house was demolished amidst much opposition and the Ball House awaits an unknown fate.   Part of the issue with the Ball House, a 1,773 square foot modernist dwelling, was that the home ceased to meet the criteria for today’s homeowner.  The owner, (who happens to be an architect) proposed several scenarios to the town including saving the modernist house, perhaps using it for a guest house or a pool house while building a second more functional home on the same site.  The town environmental commission denied the application only making the preservation of the modernist structure less feasible.   The application, after revision was approved by the town but unfortunately, opposed by a neighbor who enjoined in a lawsuit against the property owner.

Potential Solutions

There is no question that the remedy for preservation needs to come from the local level.  Towns that serve to be home to the varied historic structures should perhaps consider special zoning/development provisions that would serve to preserve the historic architectural fabric.  One suggestion would be to allow for increased density coverage on these sites wherein perhaps the footprint of the historic structure would not count toward the overall allowable site density. Preservation today is often about co-existence.  An avenue such as this would pave the way for the construction of an additional structure leaving the often smaller, dysfunctional historic dwelling suitable for a guest quarters, pool house or complimentary use.

Bio of the author
Marc Nadeau is a designated appraiser which extensive experience in appraising, redeveloping and restoring historic properties.  Clients in this genre include individuals, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation and the Philadelphia Preservation Trust.  Additional information regarding Mr. Nadeau’s services is available at: www.marcnadeau.com